Skip to main content

Table 2 Association between regular hypertension follow-up management and family doctor contract services status among older adults with hypertension in Shandong, China, 2018

From: The impact of hypertension follow-up management on the choices of signing up family doctor contract services: does socioeconomic status matter?

Characteristics

Model 1a

 

Model 2b

 

Model 3c

 

Model 4d

 
 

OR (95%CI)

P-value

OR (95%CI)

P-value

OR (95%CI)

P-value

OR (95%CI)

P-value

Main terms

Follow-up management (Irregular Ref)

 Regular

1.28 (1.04, 1.58)

0.018

1.07 (0.81, 1.41)

0.642

1.77 (1.21, 2.61)

0.004

1.65 (1.27, 2.15)

<0.001

Education (Illiteracy Ref)

 Primary or below

0.74 (0.60, 0.91)

0.005

0.74 (0.59, 0.91)

0.005

0.89 (0.56, 1.43)

0.637

0.73 (0.59, 0.91)

0.005

 Secondary school or above

0.58 (0.46, 0.74)

<0.001

0.58 (0.45, 0.74)

<0.001

0.97 (0.60, 1.57)

0.907

0.58 (0.45, 0.74)

<0.001

Region (Urban Ref)

 Rural

0.62 (0.52. 0.74)

<0.001

0.43 (0.29, 0.64)

<0.001

0.62 (0.52, 0.74)

<0.001

0.61 (0.51, 0.73)

<0.001

Annual household income (Low Ref)

 High

0.81 (0.67, 0.98)

0.027

0.81 (0.67, 0.98)

0.030

0.81 (0.67, 0.97)

0.024

1.35 (0.91, 1.99)

0.131

Interaction term

 

Follow-up management×Region

 Regular×Rural

 

1.55 (1.02, 2.35)

0.041

    

Follow-up management×Education

 

 Regular×Primary or below

   

0.80 (0.47, 1.34)

0.391

  

 Regular×Secondary school or above

   

0.53 (0.32, 0.88)

0.015

  

Follow-up management×Income

 Regular×High

     

0.53 (0.35, 0.81)

0.003

Control variables

Gender (Male Ref)

 

 Female

0.62 (0.50, 0.77)

<0.001

0.62 (0.50, 0.76)

<0.001

0.62 (0.50, 0.76)

<0.001

0.61 (0.49, 0.76)

<0.001

 Age

  

0.99 (0.97, 1.00)

0.032

0.99 (0.97, 1.00)

0.033

0.99 (0.97, 1.00)

0.033

Marital statuse (Single Ref)

 

 Married

1.09 (0.83, 1.44)

0.538

1.08 (0.82, 1.43)

0.569

1.07 (0.81, 1.42)

0.622

1.07 (0.81, 1.41)

0.627

Need caregiving (No Ref)

 

 Yes

0.83 (0.64, 1.06)

0.137

0.82 (0.64, 1.06)

0.125

0.82 (0.64, 1.06)

0.130

0.83 (0.64, 1.06)

0.142

Cigarette smoking (No Ref)

 

 Yes

0.81 (0.63, 1.04)

0.096

0.81 (0.63, 1.04)

0.103

0.81 (0.63, 1.05)

0.114

0.81 (0.63, 1.04)

0.100

Alcohol drinking (No Ref)

 

 Yes

0.78 (0.62, 0.99)

0.040

0.78 (0.62, 1.00)

0.041

0.78 (0.61, 0.98)

0.036

0.78 (0.61, 0.98)

0.035

Health screening (No Ref)

 

 Yes

2.92 (2.43, 3.50)

<0.001

2.90 (2.41, 3.48)

<0.001

2.91 (2.43, 3.50)

<0.001

2.89 (2.41, 3.48)

<0.001

Living arrangements (With others Ref)

 Alone

0.99 (0.72, 1.36)

0.966

0.99 (0.72, 1.36)

0.958

0.98 (0.72, 1.35)

0.922

0.98 (0.72, 1.35)

0.918

Blood pressure situation (Abnormal Ref)

 Normal

1.36 (1.16, 1.60)

<0.001

1.36 (1.15, 1.60)

<0.001

1.36 (1.16, 1.61)

<0.001

1.35 (1.15, 1.60)

<0.001

Medication (Irregular Ref)

 

 Regular

0.98 (0.81, 1.19)

0.858

0.98 (0.81, 1.19)

0.860

0.98 (0.81, 1.19)

0.860

0.98 (0.81, 1.19)

0.844

  1. aAdjusted for all control variables
  2. bAdjusted for model 2 criteria and the interaction between hypertension follow-up management and region
  3. cAdjusted for model 3 criteria and the interaction between hypertension follow-up management and education
  4. dAdjusted for model 4 criteria and the interaction between hypertension follow-up management and household income
  5. eSingles include those who are unmarried (27, 0.87%), divorced (8, 0.26%), widowed (520, 16.71%) and others (2, 0.06%)